In this era of reels and consequently monkeying attention span, it becomes impossible to make a person read anything except those which are valuable to them, and the situation gets exacerbated because people have their respective ways of attributing values to a material, therefore, every writer has to first convince a reader that the meaning of his words would be constructive to their life. Therefore, this writer is having a Herculean task of holding the attention of readers, which he may not be able to do uniformly across the bar. However, one cannot but accept that independence is that virtue that everyone seeks in their life, and therefore, the writer thinks that the task in that regard may become easier. Anyways, the writer starts by saying this:
The question is— Have we freed ourselves from dependence after bestowing ourselves with documentary independence? This question is termed by many as a bland cliche of rhetoric, however, such a question does not lose its virginity only because it is often asked. The writer is disinclined to ask this question instead, he puts the record straight in no uncertain terms.
Undoubtedly, girls are been raped, and the blood and the voice of the media attend its crescendo when such rape is committed on a Dalit girl or when a Muslim boy rapes a Hindu girl. Ragging continues to be the traditional sport but the media becomes sorry when the ragged's life comes to an end. The upper caste kills the lower caste, thereby providing the media with a story, and when the converse happens, the media gets justification. The politicians change parties and CBI and ED stop raiding them. Politicians disbelieve the executive on China, and one of them says that the Foreign Minister does not know China. And the latter therefore decides to take classes but changes his mind upon coming to know that the former was taking classes from China on China. The effort by which the Ministers, with some alphabetical changes, become Monsters, of course, is accompanied by behavioral changes as well, with that same effort, they say that we were always monsters. The advancement of technology with the sophisticated invasion of privacy, which exists only in mind, gives us the undesired privilege of witnessing the welfare schemes being used by the workers of the political party, in power, to fund the party. I convict myself of missing many events like Chandrayaan, Manipur, Bengal, Rajasthan, etc. but let the readers complete my incomplete work.
Nowadays this writer sees the trend of people coming forward to talk about sexuality and their sexual preferences and such indicates sexual independence. This writer does not also miss the fact that courts say the people in marriage do also have their sexual autonomy, possibly of exercising outside their marriage, which is termed by many as modern India, which this writer also appreciates, albeit reserving his comment on promiscuous life but is this called independence from our mind, which is usurped by kaleidoscopic expressions of fear? Now this writer notes that on 15 August after experiencing the wrath of the British and its predecessors, we the Indians have taken the sovereignty of the country extremely seriously, and therefore any attempted invasions would not be meted with a non-cooperation movement but a violent one.
Therefore, What has been the impact of sovereignty on our lives? We are fearful and fear has many expressions. The mind creates fears. Our country is now free but our mind does not allow us to be free, Why this contradiction? Identity is the centrifugal force of fear. But can anyone leave their identity? Sovereignty concretizes identity and thereby allows a country to immunize itself from any potential threat to its identity however, the writer thinks that individuals should not nourish and hold on to their individual identity, if they do so, the same cannot get rid of fear because we have different identities, which create a competitive field of subjectivity, where every one of such identities locks horns with each other for coming first thereby giving birth to conflict, which prevents us from associating ourselves with the biggest identity that may be the universe or if you want to remain confined, then this country, therefore, do we have to give up our respective identity to attain the freedom from fear?
This writer asks, Do we have any identity of our own, and if we have, is not such identity imposed on us? You are a boy/girl/anything except the two, which is imposed by your biology, your name is imposed by a human or group of humans, your behaviors, are imposed by your environment, and your designation, is conferred by others, therefore, identity is not an organic product that arises from inside, it may be argued that identity sometimes is created by the external stimuli, influencing your inside thereby creating an identity, but that can not be said to be an identity inherently arising from inside. Therefore, we do not have any identity, and we can easily see that here we are fighting to protect such identity, whether it is cultural, territorial, biological, or even religious. Therefore, if freedom means being free from every obstacle, which makes you work in their way and not in your way, thereby detaining you, then we shall surrender our synthetic identity to get mixed with an infinite being not only in this day but every day because we are here for an ocean and ocean is created by many droplets of water but not by a single tsunami.
The question is— Have we freed ourselves from dependence after bestowing ourselves with documentary independence? This question is termed by many as a bland cliche of rhetoric, however, such a question does not lose its virginity only because it is often asked. The writer is disinclined to ask this question instead, he puts the record straight in no uncertain terms.
Undoubtedly, girls are been raped, and the blood and the voice of the media attend its crescendo when such rape is committed on a Dalit girl or when a Muslim boy rapes a Hindu girl. Ragging continues to be the traditional sport but the media becomes sorry when the ragged's life comes to an end. The upper caste kills the lower caste, thereby providing the media with a story, and when the converse happens, the media gets justification. The politicians change parties and CBI and ED stop raiding them. Politicians disbelieve the executive on China, and one of them says that the Foreign Minister does not know China. And the latter therefore decides to take classes but changes his mind upon coming to know that the former was taking classes from China on China. The effort by which the Ministers, with some alphabetical changes, become Monsters, of course, is accompanied by behavioral changes as well, with that same effort, they say that we were always monsters. The advancement of technology with the sophisticated invasion of privacy, which exists only in mind, gives us the undesired privilege of witnessing the welfare schemes being used by the workers of the political party, in power, to fund the party. I convict myself of missing many events like Chandrayaan, Manipur, Bengal, Rajasthan, etc. but let the readers complete my incomplete work.
Nowadays this writer sees the trend of people coming forward to talk about sexuality and their sexual preferences and such indicates sexual independence. This writer does not also miss the fact that courts say the people in marriage do also have their sexual autonomy, possibly of exercising outside their marriage, which is termed by many as modern India, which this writer also appreciates, albeit reserving his comment on promiscuous life but is this called independence from our mind, which is usurped by kaleidoscopic expressions of fear? Now this writer notes that on 15 August after experiencing the wrath of the British and its predecessors, we the Indians have taken the sovereignty of the country extremely seriously, and therefore any attempted invasions would not be meted with a non-cooperation movement but a violent one.
Therefore, What has been the impact of sovereignty on our lives? We are fearful and fear has many expressions. The mind creates fears. Our country is now free but our mind does not allow us to be free, Why this contradiction? Identity is the centrifugal force of fear. But can anyone leave their identity? Sovereignty concretizes identity and thereby allows a country to immunize itself from any potential threat to its identity however, the writer thinks that individuals should not nourish and hold on to their individual identity, if they do so, the same cannot get rid of fear because we have different identities, which create a competitive field of subjectivity, where every one of such identities locks horns with each other for coming first thereby giving birth to conflict, which prevents us from associating ourselves with the biggest identity that may be the universe or if you want to remain confined, then this country, therefore, do we have to give up our respective identity to attain the freedom from fear?
This writer asks, Do we have any identity of our own, and if we have, is not such identity imposed on us? You are a boy/girl/anything except the two, which is imposed by your biology, your name is imposed by a human or group of humans, your behaviors, are imposed by your environment, and your designation, is conferred by others, therefore, identity is not an organic product that arises from inside, it may be argued that identity sometimes is created by the external stimuli, influencing your inside thereby creating an identity, but that can not be said to be an identity inherently arising from inside. Therefore, we do not have any identity, and we can easily see that here we are fighting to protect such identity, whether it is cultural, territorial, biological, or even religious. Therefore, if freedom means being free from every obstacle, which makes you work in their way and not in your way, thereby detaining you, then we shall surrender our synthetic identity to get mixed with an infinite being not only in this day but every day because we are here for an ocean and ocean is created by many droplets of water but not by a single tsunami.
Thank you for your comment